[Patch]patch for some systemtap test cases failure

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Hi -

wcohen wrote:

> What is the logic of making the pass-5 tests being run [against]
> *installed* copy of systemtap which the pass-[1234] tests are only
> run against the build tree?

The pass-5 tests best simulate real usage.  The pass-[1-4] tests are
tantamount to unit tests, which are easily (and I hope frequently) run
within unprivileged build sessions.

> It seems logical to make it possible to be able to run that
> pass-[1234] tests against installed systemtap also.

I suppose one could, but it's redundant.  Chances are that any
systemtap binary that was installed will already have had the
build-time test suite run against it.

- FChE