[Bug kprobes/2152] jprobe variant to run handler instead of probed function

[anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com]

------- Additional Comments From anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com  2006-01-16 17:26 -------
> Probably just calling "return" instead of "jprobe_return" from the jprobe
> handler would do the trick ? 
You can't do that(at least in the current design) as jprobe_handler are 
executed with preempt disabled and current_kprobe set to this probe. Hence 
jprobe_handler() _must_ execute jprobe_return(), so that Kprobe code can 
reverse the preempt count and clear current_kprobe.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2152

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.