Recent test results

[William Cohen]

Martin Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:35 -0500, William Cohen wrote:
> 
>>Tried out testing a current snapshot of systemtap (20051111) on some
>>systems.
> 
> [...]
> 
>>Looking into why some of the x86_64 tests start failing when all are
>>run. It looks like it is failing in the same way as the ia64 tests
>>that Anil ran earlier in the week; things go wrong with simple.exp.
>>Also noticed that x86_64 version failed to report the systemtap
>>version.
> 
> I got the same results as you.
> 
> I'm certainly not an expect expert, but a quick look at stap_run.exp
> shows a major flaw. I made a quick fix and now I get:
> 
> Running ./systemtap.samples/syscalls2.exp ...
> Running ./systemtap.samples/sysopen.exp ...
> Running ./systemtap.samples/transport.exp ...
> 
>                 === systemtap Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes            107
> 
> kernel version: 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp
> systemtap translator version: version 0.4.2 built 2005-11-11
> 
> 
> 

Thanks, Martin.

I am wondering if there are similar close operations missing in test run 
later in the sequence.


-Will