building without module support

[Baruch Even]

Roland McGrath wrote:
> kprobes is pretty meaningless without module support, since there aren't
> any kprobe_register calls built into the kernel and thus there is no way to
> use the code but by loading a module.

It's not impossible, during my own work I had code for debugging that is
compiled into the kernel and not as a module.

I do agree that for systemtap purposes having no modules is an unlikely
case.

Baruch