[Perftools]hello world
Frank Ch. Eigler
fche@redhat.com
Fri Jul 15 15:10:00 GMT 2005
hunt wrote:
> [...]
> Doing context as an array indexed by cpu is fine for now. I did the
> same originally because I was using very large arrays and I was
> concerned about backporting to 2.4. However its ugly, especially for
> small structs like context. Cache-line bouncing will kill scalability.
> [...]
But the emitted "struct context" is not small. It contains all locals
and temporaries for all valid nesting levels, for all CPUs. Can you
be more explicit about which cache-lines you are concerned about
bouncing?
- FChE
More information about the Systemtap
mailing list