[PATCH] Allow a jprobe to coexist with kprobes

[Keshavamurthy, Anil S]

>
>Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:
>
>>>Two jprobes cannot be
>>>registered at the same address however.
>>>
>>>
>>Are there any plans to remove above restrictions in future?
>>
>>
>I am not sure why we need to register two jprobes at the entry of a
>function.
>Do you have some practical case where this feature would be useful?
I guess we are allowing multiple tapsets to coexist in the system at the
same time. 
If that is correct, then in this case two independent tapset might be
interested to register a jprobe at the entry of the same function. Does
this answer your question? 

-Anil