Adding Ruby support to Source Navigator

[Ben Elliston]

   > I'm trying to decide whether all libraries matching a specific pattern (say,
   > "*high*.so" should be loaded, or whether they should be named explicitly in
   > the configuration file.  Thoughts?

   Hmm. I hate configuration files. I would vote for a pattern.
   Something like:
   sn*high*.so on unix
   and
   sn*high*.dll on windows.

What about the problems whereby users get confused by implict behaviour?
I have implicit behaviour. :-)

Ben