Tue Aug 1 17:24:00 GMT 2000
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> This would be cool, but then we are dependent on the user having a
> "clean" Tcl version (Some Tcl/Tk apps require core patching before
> they run). (Of course I'm assume you mean that we should load into
> the users local Tcl/Tk and not a version from us.)
> Couldn't snavigator's configure script test the installed Tcl/Tk to
> determine if it was usable? That's precisely what Autoconf is for!
We could, but how many tests? and what needs tested to make
sure we're not running on a SN safe tcl/tk. Is it really important?
I know it's going to be hard tracking down reported bugs only to
find out the user is running on a none standard tcl/tk.
> Yeah. It'd also be nice to make Berkeley DB a loadable library, too.
> Perhaps they already allow it to be built shared?
I'd like to see a more generic DB interface first so we can swap
out our DB back ends. I've not look at this yet, but may be they
both go hand in hand.
More information about the Sourcenav