sigaction & pthread_sigmask

Ross Johnson Ross.Johnson@homemail.com.au
Fri Jun 20 01:59:00 GMT 2008


William Ahern wrote:
> Would it be worthwhile to submit a sigaction, sigwait, sigprocmask,
> pthread_sigmask patch? Or are signals strictly outside the scope of the
> project?
>
> I'm working on sigaction and sigwait implementations--using atomic CAS
> operations for async-safety--intended for a portable kqueue library. But the
> library depends on pthreads-w32 anyhow, and it would be cleaner to simply
> patch upstream
Please submit the patch. Send it to me directly if it's large and I will 
put it up on the FTP site for others to review if they wish.

Regards.
Ross



More information about the Pthreads-win32 mailing list