snap-2004-11-03 breakage
Ross Johnson
rpj@ise.canberra.edu.au
Wed Nov 3 15:38:00 GMT 2004
Gisle Vanem wrote:
> "Ross Johnson" wrote:
>
>> I definitely don't want to break applications unnecessarily and
>> particularly applications that have been ported to several different
>> POSIX systems, but on the other hand POSIX thread IDs are not
>> required to be scalar. See the rationale from the definition of
>> pthread_equal() in the Single Unix Specification version 3, which says:
>
>
> Great, but when was pthread_equal() introduced? I'd like to support
> old versions of pthread-win32 too.
>
pthread_equal() has been in pthreads-win32 since 1998. pthread_kill()
with the sigzero functionality is a lot newer - introduced in
snapshot-2003-08-15.
> BTW. I cannot find a compile-time VERSION define to check against.
> If there where, I could #ifdef around this problem.
I should have done that for this snapshot. Don't be surprised to see a
new snapshot in a day or two just to include that.
>
> BTW2. I'm, getting 2 copies of every reply from you. I would prefer
> replies
> to go to the list only. Could you please make the mailing-list program
> add a "Reply-to" header?
>
I have no control over the mailing list, but I can save you from getting
two copies from me.
> --gv
>
More information about the Pthreads-win32
mailing list