condvar.c
Bossom, John
John.Bossom@Cognos.COM
Wed May 26 10:17:00 GMT 1999
You are correct... (assuming the code snippet you sent originated from my
original source... it looks like it does... I don't have the win32-pthreads
snapshot).
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Slacik [ mailto:Peter.Slacik@tatramed.sk ]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 1999 12:19 PM
To: Pthreads-Win32 Mailing List
Subject: condvar.c
Hi thread writers,
I tried to upgrade (after half year) to the current pthreads snapshot,
snap-1999-04-07, and I suspect one inequality test to be wrong:
cvs diff -c -r1.1 -r1.2 condvar.c
Index: condvar.c
===================================================================
RCS file: pthread/condvar.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -c -r1.1 -r1.2
*** condvar.c 1999/04/07 12:18:40 1.1
--- condvar.c 1999/05/26 16:10:08 1.2
***************
*** 851,857 ****
* Wait for all the awakened threads to acquire their part of
* the counting semaphore
*/
! if (WaitForSingleObject (cv->waitersDone, INFINITE) !=
WAIT_OBJECT_0)
{
result = 0;
--- 851,857 ----
* Wait for all the awakened threads to acquire their part of
* the counting semaphore
*/
! if (WaitForSingleObject (cv->waitersDone, INFINITE) ==
WAIT_OBJECT_0)
{
result = 0;
Please check this.
Regards
Peter Slacik
More information about the Pthreads-win32
mailing list