Adding binutils to the GNU Toolchain buildbot on sourceware

[Luis Machado]

On 4/25/22 10:04, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was talking to Nick what the best way was to add binutils to the
> buildbot at https://builder.sourceware.org/. We came up with the
> following which tests a minimal setup on a somewhat older but stable
> distro:
> 
> - Debian 10, x86_64 which has Linux 4.19.235, GLIBC 2.28, gcc 8.3.0
>    GNU and Binutils 2.31.1
> 
> - Only triggers a build when any files under bfd/ binutils/ gas/ ld/
>    gold/ elfcpp/ include/ libiberty/ opcodes/ or the top-level
>    configure or Makefile.in changes.
> 
> - configure --enable-gold --enable-shared --enable-target=all
> 
> - make all-gas all-ld all-binutils all-gold
> 
> - make check-ld check-gas check-binutils
> 
> - log files ld/ld.{log,sum} gas/testsuite/gas.{log,sum}
>    binutils/binutils.{log,sum}
> 
> - Sents email to this list and any committers when the build changes
>    from sucess to failure (or back).
> 
> All of this can of course be changed/extended.
> There are other distros/arches available:
> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/workers
> And we hope to add container based workers to support even more
> distros.
> 
> We only build a smaller set of tools to make sure you get a
> notification within 10 minutes if anything was broken (or fixed). We
> do build gold, but don't test it because the testsuite isn't
> zero-fail.
> 
> If you want Frank also has scripts to add the log files to bunsen.
> 
> The intention was that this was a zero-fail testsuite subset
> (gas,ld,binutils) but we did find two ld test failures:
> FAIL: Run p_align-1b with PIE
> FAIL: Run p_align-1d with -Wl,-z,max-page-size=0x1000 with PIE
> These tests seem to rely on a specific glibc version/bug fix. Nick is
> working on a fix.
> 
> Please let me know if any if this should be changed. The intention is
> that the buildbot will help with maintaining binutils, keep it
> building and zero-fail. If it isn't doing that, but get annoying let
> change the configuration.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark

As a general comment, I think we should have a single buildbot entry for 
the whole of binutils-gdb.

Given changes to bfd and opcodes can affect gdb, why not build gdb 
alongside the other tools? You don't need to run the gdb testsuite, 
which should make things much more deterministic.

I don't expect the build times including gdb/gdbserver/sim will be much 
longer.