FW: svn+ssh connection times out (fwd)

[Jonathan Larmour]

On 30/08/12 11:40, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Not sure what *I* am asked to do (or why I was picked), unless
> it's forwarding a message that bounced (perhaps due to the
> connection failure) when trying to address the list directly.

Looks like it... the previous mail didn't come through to the
overseers@gcc.gnu.org list. That implies he can't contact the server at
all. It seems like it's being filtered by a firewall, but I've checked the
sourceware machine's own firewall and there's nothing with IP addresses
202.* being filtered.

It might be the Red Hat infrastructure where sourceware is co-located is
filtering things, although that seems unlikely. In particular on
sourceware I can successfully ping the 202.56.249.162 address he provides.

Kumar, please try pinging sourceware.org from your machine to see if that
works. You can take off the 'overseers' list in your reply - let's do this
off list instead.

Jifl

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:04:57
> From: "Kumar, Venkataramanan" <Venkataramanan.Kumar@amd.com>
> To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
> Subject: FW: svn+ssh connection times out
> 
> Hi H-P,
> 
> Can you please have a look at this issue.
> 
> IT people say that traffic is dropping from the other end.  They say AMD NAT 202.56.249.162 added to Access control list in gcc.gnu.org will solve the issue.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kumar, Venkataramanan
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 12:00 PM
> To: 'overseers@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: svn+ssh connection times out
> 
> Hi,
> 
> My account name: vekumar@gcc.gnu.org
> 
> I have Write after approval access for the gcc repository.
> 
> I am trying to checkout gcc repository using svn+ssh from Bangalore (India).
> 
>> svn co svn+ssh://vekumar@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc
> 
> Read from socket failed: Connection timed out
> svn: Connection closed unexpectedly
> 
> I checked with our IT people. They say that gcc.gnu.org site is not allowing the Bangalore office traffic.
> 
> Please suggest a way to solve this.
> 
> Regards,
> Venkat.
> 
> 


-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine