yet yet more htdig: gcc ml:s losing messages?

Hans-Peter Nilsson hp@bitrange.com
Tue Jan 21 07:53:00 GMT 2003


On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:28:08AM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > >>So the question is: is there a way to find out whether the gcc
> > >>mailing list archives are "sane", as opposed to losing messages?
> Jason run the obvious(?) find (doh!) and the judgement is that
> it's htdig that is fishy.

Looks like locale-related fish.  Trying yet another round,
setting LC_ALL=C.  It definitely affects "sort" (the utility)
results, though I can't trivially repeat the occurrences I saw
of

bugreport
bug_report
bugreport

brgds, H-P



More information about the Overseers mailing list