yet yet more htdig: gcc ml:s losing messages?
Hans-Peter Nilsson
hp@bitrange.com
Tue Jan 21 07:53:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:28:08AM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > >>So the question is: is there a way to find out whether the gcc
> > >>mailing list archives are "sane", as opposed to losing messages?
> Jason run the obvious(?) find (doh!) and the judgement is that
> it's htdig that is fishy.
Looks like locale-related fish. Trying yet another round,
setting LC_ALL=C. It definitely affects "sort" (the utility)
results, though I can't trivially repeat the occurrences I saw
of
bugreport
bug_report
bugreport
brgds, H-P
More information about the Overseers
mailing list