Fix missing declarations in libgloss m68k
Jean-Paul Mari
djipi.mari@gmail.com
Mon Aug 4 12:52:57 GMT 2025
Hi Corinna,
Thank you for the feedback, I will keep this in mind for the future.
Regards,
JP
________________________________
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, August 4, 2025 05:44
To: Jean-Paul Mari <djipi.mari@gmail.com>
Cc: newlib@sourceware.org <newlib@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Fix missing declarations in libgloss m68k
Hi Jean-Paul,
On Aug 3 15:03, Jean-Paul Mari wrote:
> This patch avoids compilation errors.
>
> From 607d7d9a06cbd53144fee62983bb3b4c338f37de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jean-Paul Mari <djipi.mari@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 06:57:26 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Fix missing declarations in libgloss m68k
>
> This patch adds missing function declarations in several m68k-specific libgloss source files.
> This helps avoid implicit declaration compiler warnings / errors and ensures better portability.
>
> Tested by building newlib for m68k-elf with GCC.
This text should be in the actual patch commit message, not in the cover
letter. I pushed your patch with this commit message.
You don't need to send a cover letter if the series consists of only one
patch, btw.
Thanks,
Corinna
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20250804/f3a1e773/attachment.htm>
More information about the Newlib
mailing list