Broken RISC-V code in newlib
Jeff Law
jlaw@ventanamicro.com
Tue Mar 25 16:54:27 GMT 2025
On 3/25/25 9:20 AM, Eric Salem wrote:
> On 3/25/25 10:04 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 3/25/25 8:23 AM, Kito Cheng wrote:
>>> Hi Eric:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/newlib/libc/machine/riscv/sys/asm.h b/newlib/libc/machine/riscv/sys/asm.h
>>>> index 0a354b220517..a9792e964ebc 100644
>>>> --- a/newlib/libc/machine/riscv/sys/asm.h
>>>> +++ b/newlib/libc/machine/riscv/sys/asm.h
>>>> @@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
>>>> #ifndef _SYS_ASM_H
>>>> #define _SYS_ASM_H
>>>>
>>>> +#if !__ASSEMBLER__
>>>> #include <stdint.h>
>>>> +#endif
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Macros to handle different pointer/register sizes for 32/64-bit code
>>>> @@ -22,13 +24,17 @@
>>>> # define SZREG 8
>>>> # define REG_S sd
>>>> # define REG_L ld
>>>> +#if !__ASSEMBLER__
>>>> typedef uint64_t uintxlen_t;
>>>> +#endif
>>>> #elif __riscv_xlen == 32
>>>> # define PTRLOG 2
>>>> # define SZREG 4
>>>> # define REG_S sw
>>>> # define REG_L lw
>>>> +#if !__ASSEMBLER__
>>>> typedef uint32_t uintxlen_t;
>>>> +#endif
>>>> #else
>>>> # error __riscv_xlen must equal 32 or 64
>>>> #endif
>>>
>>> Seems like sys/asm.h is not the right place to put those C typedef and
>>> also including #include <stdint.h>
>>>
>>> Could you just create a xlenint.h in newlib/libc/machine/riscv/ then
>>> include that by #include "xlenint.h" in those places you want to use?
>>>
>>> Since uintxlen_t is not defined in either standard C or RISC-V
>>> conventions, so I would like to prevent exposing that to users if
>>> possible :)
>> In fact, the typedef really should be prefixed with underscores from a namespace pollution standpoint. It's not OK for headers to be defining types like this.
>
> Is the convention to prefix it with a double underscore? I'm trying to look up what's
> typically done.
Two underscores.
jeff
More information about the Newlib
mailing list