Moving C11 Functions from winsup to newlib

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Mar 17 09:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Thanks. Sounds like moving the uchar.h file is a good idea. But newlib will
> need its
> own more flexible implementation.

Exactly.

> What about the C11 function timespec_get? Cygwin has the obvious
> implementation. Should that just go in time/?

Sure, no worries.  However, not yet.  We're working on the Cygwin 3.6
release, and I would prefer if we do a function and header reshuffle
only after we cut the 3.6 branch.


Thanks,
Corinna


> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --joel
> 
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 5:55 AM Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > On Mar 14 11:53, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > In looking at what's missing from RTEMS for C11, I noticed that these
> > from
> > > uchar.h are in winsup (as .cc) but not in newlib.
> > >
> > > size_t c16rtomb(char *restrict, char16_t, mbstate_t *restrict);
> > > size_t c32rtomb(char *restrict, char32_t, mbstate_t *restrict);
> > > size_t mbrtoc16(char16_t *restrict, const char *restrict, size_t,
> > mbstate_t
> > > *restrict);
> > > size_t mbrtoc32(char32_t *restrict, const char *restrict, size_t,
> > mbstate_t
> > > *restrict);
> > >
> > > Would it be ok to move them to the newlib side?
> >
> > We can move the uchar.h header to newlib verbatim, it's target
> > independent.
> >
> > It's not as easy for the actual implementation, because Cygwin's
> > implementation relies on char16_t being equivalent to wchar_t as Cygwin
> > uses the Windows UTF-16 as wchar_t type for simplicity.
> >
> > A truly independent implementation must not rely on wchar_t being any
> > Unicode variation, be it UCS-2, UTF_16, or UTF-32.
> >
> > Some systems have their own wchar_t, as with the historical
> > implementations of wchar_t in newlib/libc/ctype/jp2uc.c for japanese
> > codesets (S)JIS/EUCJP.
> > We should probably get rid of them in favor of true wchar_t == "Some
> > Unicode" for *all* targets.
> >
> > > Add a uchar directory? Or where?
> >
> > Either that, or in string.
> >
> > > What about converting the implementation to C? Is that needed?
> >
> > The Cygwin functions are plain C. They are just inside a C++ source.
> >
> >
> > Corinna
> >
> >