New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS-Newlib

Corinna Vinschen vinschen@redhat.com
Tue Feb 11 12:02:47 GMT 2025


On Feb 11 10:50, Alexey Lapshin wrote:
> Hi, interesting finding,
> 
> Are not all these found "underflows" issues false-positive?
> Because all of them are under `while(!TOO_SMALL_LITTLE_BLOCK(len))` block
> which guarantees no underflow of "len" variable

Yeah, looks like false positives to me, too.


Corinna



More information about the Newlib mailing list