error in tgamma
Paul Zimmermann
Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr
Wed Feb 8 15:55:51 GMT 2023
Hi,
while testing Newlib 4.3.0, I also noticed the following regression
with respect to 4.2.0 for tgammaf:
zimmerma@tartine:~/svn/tbd/20/src/binary32_exhaustive$ VERBOSE=-v ./doit2.newlib tgamma
Checking tgamma with newlib-4.3.0.20230120
Using RedHat newlib
MPFR library: 4.2.0
MPFR header: 4.2.0 (based on 4.2.0)
Checking function tgammaf with MPFR_RNDN
...
libm wrong by up to nan ulp(s) [9223372036854775808] for x=-0x1p+0
tgamma gives inf
mpfr_tgamma gives -nan
For a negative integer, tgamma should return NaN.
Best regards,
Paul Zimmermann
More information about the Newlib
mailing list