Possible issue with pow(-1, NaN) in newlib's libm
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Fri Feb 14 09:16:00 GMT 2020
Hi Nicolas,
On Feb 14 09:11, Nicolas Brunie wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> First time sender, excuse me if I misspoke.
>
> I think I may have encountered a bug in the implementation of pow:
> pow(-1.0, NaN) returns 1.0 when it should return NaN.
> Because ix is used to check input vs 1.0 rather than hx, -1.0 is mistaken for 1.0
You are right, thanks for catching! I pushed your patch.
Next time, please send the patch in `git format-patch' format,
that's easier to apply :)
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20200214/942f52a2/attachment.sig>
More information about the Newlib
mailing list