i386 and x86_64 fenv support
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Tue Aug 27 15:39:00 GMT 2019
On Aug 27 08:31, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
>
> Earlier we discussed moving the winsup fenv.h files to newlib. Splitting
> winsup/cygwin/include/fenv.h to create a sys/fenv.h looks easy enough.
> But I have some status and a question after tinkering with this code out
> of tree and compiling with the RTEMS i386 and x86_64
>
> It includes winsup.h and wincap.h but it doesn't need them.
Yeah, that's kind of a boilerplate include in Cygwin code. Just scratch
it, it can't be overly important for the fenv functionality.
> [...]
> There are prototypes for fegetprec() and fesetprec(). I think the
> prototypes need to move to the shared fenv.h and commented
> stubs for the constants needs to be in the shared dummy sys/fenv.h.
> Does this sound right?
As far as I can see, none of Linux or BSD have these functions. It may
be the right thing to do to keep them local to Cygwin since they never
made it into a standard or one of the systems we're interested in here.
Ideally they are never defined in a header, not even on Cygwin. We only
have to keep exporting these symbols in Cygwin for backward compat.
> My remaining issue is that it appears that i386 and x86_64 will need to
> share the same files. Do I just copy the files to both machine directories?
> I don't know if newlib's build infrastructure supports putting it in one
> place and using it in another architecture.
Shouldn't a symlink from x86_64/file to ../i386/file work? git handles
symlinks just fine.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20190827/586f5ae4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Newlib
mailing list