Bug with gcvtf
Mon Aug 26 13:32:00 GMT 2019
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 7:16 AM Rian Quinn <email@example.com> wrote:
> The "gcvtf" function in newlib/newlib/libc/stdlib/efgcvt.c is in the file
> before gcvt, but relies on it with an implicit definition. When attempting
> to compile Newlib on x86_64 for Libc++ support, I get a compile error as
> the definitions of the implicit version does not match the actual version.
> To fix the issue, all I had to do was to place the gcvtf version _after_
> the implementation of gcvt and it compiles fine.
Can you find the upstream source of this file and see if it has this change
and possibly others?
I don't doubt the change is needed but this sounds like a hint to see if we
are.in sync with the upstream.
More information about the Newlib