Historical Origins of y0l, y1l, and ynl Methods
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Tue Feb 12 15:24:00 GMT 2019
On Feb 12 09:14, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:03 AM Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 12 08:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > These three methods are in glibc math.h but I can't find anything that
> > > gives a standards basis or historical origin. They are not in newlib.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any insight?
> >
> > http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/y0.3.html:
> >
> > CONFORMING TO
> >
> > The functions returning double conform to SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001,
> > POSIX.1-2008. The others are nonstandard functions that also exist
> > on the BSDs.
> >
>
> Thanks. I should have just done a man on them. :(
>
> I assume they aren't that commonly used or Newlib would have picked them
> up over the years.
My math is such that I get headaches just looking at the function
names :)
Adding target independent f and l functions to newlib would be nice, tho.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20190212/912dcb19/attachment.sig>
More information about the Newlib
mailing list