nvptx abort implementation

[Tom de Vries]

On 05/03/2018 10:39 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Tom!
> 
> On Wed, 2 May 2018 19:36:53 +0200, Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com> wrote:

>> IV.
>>
>> I'd prefer a robust abort implementation that:
>> - does not depend on the __builtin_trap gcc bug being fixed, and
> 
> Why not just do that?  (Even just on trunk, given that the current
> implementation as used for release branches will effectively also abort?)
> 

Well, what you're saying here is that a robust implementation is not 
needed, given that you think that the current implementation will work 
in all the use cases you can think of and think of as relevant.

I OTOH think that with a robust implementation, it will work in all use 
cases.

Thanks,
- Tom