[PATCH] ssp: do not use __ssp_protected_ symbol prefixes
Yaakov Selkowitz
yselkowi@redhat.com
Fri Jan 26 06:23:00 GMT 2018
This is a NetBSD-specific detail which does not apply to Newlib, causing
linking issues in certain scenarios:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-01/msg00189.html
Signed-off-by: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@redhat.com>
---
Corinna, this should be considered for Cygwin 2.10.
newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h b/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h
index 5c65cf4b2..922908659 100644
--- a/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h
+++ b/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
__chk_fail()
#define __ssp_decl(rtype, fun, args) \
rtype __ssp_real_(fun) args __asm__(__ASMNAME(#fun)); \
-__ssp_inline rtype fun args __asm__(__ASMNAME("__ssp_protected_" #fun)); \
__ssp_inline rtype fun args
#define __ssp_redirect_raw(rtype, fun, args, call, cond, bos) \
__ssp_decl(rtype, fun, args) \
--
2.15.1
More information about the Newlib
mailing list