[PATCH] ssp: do not use __ssp_protected_ symbol prefixes

Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi@redhat.com
Fri Jan 26 06:23:00 GMT 2018


This is a NetBSD-specific detail which does not apply to Newlib, causing
linking issues in certain scenarios:

https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-01/msg00189.html

Signed-off-by: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@redhat.com>
---
Corinna, this should be considered for Cygwin 2.10.

 newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h b/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h
index 5c65cf4b2..922908659 100644
--- a/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h
+++ b/newlib/libc/include/ssp/ssp.h
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
 		__chk_fail()
 #define __ssp_decl(rtype, fun, args) \
 rtype __ssp_real_(fun) args __asm__(__ASMNAME(#fun)); \
-__ssp_inline rtype fun args __asm__(__ASMNAME("__ssp_protected_" #fun)); \
 __ssp_inline rtype fun args
 #define __ssp_redirect_raw(rtype, fun, args, call, cond, bos) \
 __ssp_decl(rtype, fun, args) \
-- 
2.15.1



More information about the Newlib mailing list