Importing inttypes methods

[Aditya Upadhyay]

Yes,
I am following the direction.

Regards.
Aditya Upadhyay

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare@rtems.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 28 10:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> > On Jul 28 07:40, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> >> Corinna, good catch. I mentioned this issue to Joel but it dropped out
>>> >> the bottom some how. Is it only (for example) the strtoimax_l() that
>>> >> needs to be guarded, or also the _strtoimax_l? (I suspect only the
>>> >> strtoimax_l, but want to be clear before the next round of patches
>>> >> lands here.)
>>> >
>>> > The reentrant prototypes use locale_t, so they depend on including
>>> > xlocale.h, too.  It's a bit uncommon but the simplest solution.
>>> >
>>> Since the non-reentrant version (e.g., strtoimax) wraps the re-entrant
>>> one, then there is no support unless locale is available. Would it be
>>> better to have a non-reentrant, nonolocale implementation in tandem
>>> with the reentrant one, or do we not worry about it and don't support
>>> these functions at all unless the POSIX_SOURCE is set properly and
>>> BSD_VISIBLE?
>>
>> Good catch on your side, I really had to look it up now.  Here's how it
>> is in the other, similar cases like strtol:
>>
>> There are actually four functions:
>>
>>   strtol
>>   strtol_l
>>   _strtol_r
>>   _strtol_l
>>
>> _strtol_l is the internal implementation and *static*.  _strtol_r
>> is the exported reentrant function and consequentially not having
>> the locale_t parameter.
>>
>> So, why not just keep it at that for now with strtoimax, etc?  It only
>> requires minimal changes and nobody using the reentrant functions
>> actually asked for a reentrant function with thread-local locale
>> parameter yet :}
>>
>> As a result, the guards for the exported reentrant functions are not
>> required.
>>
> OK. Aditya please pursue this direction for implementation. It will
> take a bit more refactoring to get it right.
>
>>
>> Corinna
>>
>> --
>> Corinna Vinschen
>> Cygwin Maintainer
>> Red Hat