Long double complex methods

[Joel Sherrill]

On 6/29/2017 11:18 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> 
>> Also, although I don't know how to run them, doesn't someone
>> run glibc tests on newlib? They likely have tests for this for
>> newlib's purposes.
> 
> It would be interesting to see results of glibc libm tests (current git
> please, there have been major changes since the last release) for a range
> of libm implementations and operating systems, but also probably a lot of
> work to get them building with other C libraries; they make plenty of use
> of glibc features, include some internal glibc headers for configuration
> of some details of the architecture, and hardcode glibc choices of goals
> for errno, exceptions and accuracy that other libm implementations may
> differ on.  An implementation/architecture-specific libm-test-ulps file
> also needs to be generated before you can expect clean results even for an
> implementation following glibc's goals.
> 

That would be interesting. In theory, we should be able to mimic the
internal glibc .h files. The devil is in the detail.

My first order problem is that I have never seen the procedure for running
glibc tests against a newlib based toolset for any newlib target -- embedded,
Cygwin, or Linux.

Heck.. as I posted earlier, I don't even know what to do to run the
tests inside the newlib tree. :(

-joel