Importing cacoshl.c and its dependent methos,
Joel Sherrill
joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com
Wed Jun 21 15:09:00 GMT 2017
On 6/21/2017 10:02 AM, Craig Howland wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 08:04 AM, aditya upadhyay wrote:
>> So ,To not rely on stdbool.h from c99, do i have to port stdbool.h here also ?
>> Otherwise we can use
>> #ifndef __cplusplus
>> typedef enum { false, true } bool;
>> #endif
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your suggested modification. I am applying the
>> required the modification.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Aditya Upadhyay
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Jun 21 08:46, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>>> On 21/06/17 04:24, aditya upadhyay wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Developers,
>>>>> In cacoshl.c, There is a dependency between cacoshl.c and csqrtl.c.
>>>>> In ported csqrtl.c from NetBSD, stdbool.h is there, But i saw there
>>>>> is no stdbool.h.
>>>>>
>>>>> So for bool data type, I have used enum. Is it a right way or not.
>>>>> please suggest or do i have to use stdbool.h from gcc library ?
>>>> <stdbool.h> is currently not used by Newlib. I am not sure if we should add
>>>> this dependency if its only needed by csqrtl.c (in overall NetBSD libm) and
>>>> not visible to the user.
>>>>
>>>> I would replace the #include <stdbool.h> with
>>>>
>>>> #ifndef __cplusplus
>>>> typedef enum { false, true } bool;
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> and keep the rest of the code unchanged.
>>> Wait. Isn't stdbool.h available in gcc for ages? When building newlib,
>>> shouldn't we be able to rely on c99 being available?
>>>
>>>
>>> Corinna
>>>
> Yes, we can, and should. That's because complex.h and stdbool.h were added in
> C99, making C99 required for these functions. I did a quick check on some older
> cross-compiler installs that I have, and GCC 4.1.1 has stdbool.h (and 4.6.4 has
> complex.h).
Just to clarify, I did a test and added include <stdbool.h> to printf.c.
It worked and picked up the gcc version. Can we rely on this being present
or does newlib need to have its own?
I want to make sure the direction is quite clear. :)
--joel
> Craig
>
More information about the Newlib
mailing list