[PATCH] newlib/MAINTAINERS: Add OS maintainers section and myself for RTEMS and Write After Approval.
Wed Jun 14 15:49:00 GMT 2017
It would have been nicer to ask first, but that said, I am ok with a
clarification added to the definition.
For an OS maintainer, changes that add OS-specific changes to existing
shared files need approval. That means you may
make changes to an existing RTEMS section of a header file, but you cannot
add an RTEMS section to a
header or source file that did not have such a section without approval. I
don't want to have RTEMS stuff added all over the
place to save you having to have your own version in your directory.
-- Jeff J.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Corinna Vinschen <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Jun 13 16:30, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> newlib/MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>> diff --git a/newlib/MAINTAINERS b/newlib/MAINTAINERS
>> index 6117ff4..0bd93ff 100644
>> --- a/newlib/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/newlib/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ aarch64 Richard Earnshaw firstname.lastname@example.org
>> msp430 DJ Delorie email@example.com
>> Nick Clifton firstname.lastname@example.org
>> + OS Port Maintainers (OS alphabetical order)
>> +OS port maintainers may make changes in OS-specific directories, as
>> +well as OS-specific portions of the build system, without approval.
>> +RTEMS Joel Sherrill email@example.com
>> Write After Approval
>> @@ -57,3 +63,4 @@ Nick Clifton firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Eric Blake email@example.com
>> Will Newton firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Sebastian Huber email@example.com
>> +Joel Sherrill firstname.lastname@example.org
> On hold. I'm still discussing this with Jeff.
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat
More information about the Newlib