fopen() behavior: File positioning in append mode

Craig Howland howland@LGSInnovations.com
Fri Feb 3 15:11:00 GMT 2017


On 02/03/2017 05:59 AM, Stefan Heinzmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am unsure what the behavior of fopen() should be when the "a+" mode is 
> given. The source for this is in file newlib/libc/stdio/fopen.c
>
> Mode a+ translates to open() flags O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_APPEND according to the 
> POSIX standard. This would set the file position to the beginning of the file. 
> The file position would be relevant only to read operations, since the 
> O_APPEND flag causes writes to happen at the file end in any case.
>
> However, fopen() seems to set the file position to the end in this case, by 
> calling fseek() explicitly. The consequence is that read operations also 
> happen at the file end. I don't understand why this is done. Wouldn't it be 
> more useful to omit the call to fseek(), or to restrict it to the write-only 
> case?
>
> The C standard doesn't seem to be clear here. Does it actually specify what 
> the result of ftell() should be immediately after calling fopen()? I seem to 
> be unable to find conclusive text.
>
> Thanks
> Stefan
      See C99 section 7.19.3, where it defines that, if a file does support 
positioning requests, the initial position is 0 unless the file is opened in 
append mode.  If the file is opened in append mode, then the initial position is 
implementation defined.  So there is conclusive text, but it does allow a choice.
      I suggest that the newlib implementation choice makes sense. The "a" mode 
opens for writing only at the end of the file.  Using a+ adds the ability to 
read, also.  Since it is based on "a", starting at the end makes sense.  The 
user could also choose r+--based on r--in which case a reasonable assumption 
(and the required behavior) is that it would start at 0 for read.  This line of 
reasoning (which I thought of before checking the code) is borne out by the 
actual implementation--the fseek happens if "a" was used.
                 Craig



More information about the Newlib mailing list