[PATCH 001/114] Add initial port for Phoenix-RTOS.

[Jeff Johnston]

Hi Jakub,

They are not rejected.  You did submit 114 patches to look at to be fair and a number of
them require loading.  I am just looking at it today.

Licensing as LGPL is not an issue if you are building a shared library form of the library.
Otherwise, any statically linked application using your library must be licensed LGPL.  In the case of x86-linux,
the files were taken directly from glibc at the time and we do build a shared library.  

If your code has been copied/taken from LGPL sources, then you can't relicense, but if you are the original
owner, you should relicense with a more-relaxed license as I notice your code does not enable
shared library support in configure.host

-- Jeff J.

----- Original Message -----
> So question to Corrina or anyone else who is responsible for
> maintenance: what should I do now to have my patches applied? Or are
> they already rejected?
> If you wish I can send another set with changed/removed license in
> each file, but this will generate another huge set of emails.
> As for duplicated headers: this shouldn't be much of a problem,
> because the same situation is, as I see, already in Linux port.
> This has no impact on Cygwin, RTEMS or FreeBSD builds.
> 
> Later on, after publishing this (and also patches to binutils & gcc)
> we can think about reducing headers duplication.
> 
> time_t is currently defined in kernel header as typedef from int.
>