RTEMS Targets Issue #2 - ftello()/fseeko()

[Yaakov Selkowitz]

On 2016-03-19 12:10, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> We have a few files which get warnings because
> ftello() and/or fseeko() are not prototyped.
> These were protected by:
>
> #if !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || defined(__USE_XOPEN2K)

Note that __USE_* is the glibc form of the internal macros, where newlib 
has (even prior to my changes) used the BSD form __*_VISIBLE.  So this 
was wrong to start with.

> But now have:
>
> #if __LARGEFILE_VISIBLE
>
> The RTEMS fseeko() test does not explicitly define
> __USE_XOPEN2K so I am guessing it was implicit before.
>
> Does the newlib guard need tinkering, the RTEMS default
> features, or the test code in RTEMS?

feature_test_macros(7) says that _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500 includes these two 
largefile functions implicitly, but fseeko(3) says they are also 
POSIX.1-2001.  Does changing the guard to:

#if __LARGEFILE_VISIBLE || __POSIX_VISIBLE >= 200112

fix this issue?

-- 
Yaakov