[PATCH 1/4] Remove obsolete ARC system

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Nov  3 17:02, Anton Kolesov wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
> > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 6:23 PM
> > To: Anton Kolesov
> > Cc: newlib@sourceware.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Remove obsolete ARC system
> > 
> > Hi Anton,
> > 
> > On Oct 30 22:39, Anton Kolesov wrote:
> > > ARC architecture specific files has been added ages ago in newlib/libc/sys,
> > > but with invention of libgloss those files should be moved from newlib to
> > > libgloss.
> > >
> > > newlib/ChangeLog:
> > > 2015-10-30  Anton Kolesov  <Anton.Kolesov@synopsys.com>
> > >
> > > 	* configure.host: Remove ARC system.
> > > 	* libc/sys/configure: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/configure.in: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/Makefile.am: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/Makefile.in: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/aclocal.m4: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/configure: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/configure.in: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/crt0.S: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/dummy.S: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/isatty.c: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/mem-layout.c: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/sbrk.c: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/sys/syscall.h: Likewise.
> > > 	* libc/sys/arc/syscalls.c: Likewise.
> > 
> > This patch doesn't apply cleanly to the current git repo.  Can you
> > please check and resend the patch in `git format-patch' format?
> 
> File outputted by format-patch without filtering with "filterdiff" is too big
> for this mailing list - server will not pass it - patch file is 207 KB and even
> lesser file didn't passed through in my initial submission.
> 
> It seems that "filterdiff" doesn't work cleanly - it left garbage that causes
> an error in "git am". I can either modify submitted patch file so it will not
> cause an error (then configure and aclocal.m4 must be removed
> manually), or I can send patch file by some other means. What’s better?
> I suspect that that my other patches also could be affected.

I'm not sure where the size restriction starts but 100K should be fine
at least.  Can you split the patch series into a couple more mails?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20151104/a66ff1e3/attachment.sig>