[PATCH] Add typedef of stack_t for Cygwin

Jon TURNEY jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk
Wed Apr 1 18:43:00 GMT 2015

On 01/04/2015 12:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 31 18:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On 3/31/2015 6:20 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>> On 31/03/2015 16:47, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>> Why can't you move the definition that is there for RTEMS and use
>>>> it for both Cygwin and RTEMS? We have exactly the same definition
>>>> only a few lines above.
>>>> There is no point in duplicating this and when Cygwin and RTEMS
>>>> can use exactly the same code, I am personally much happier.
>>> Ok.  Attached patch is revised as you suggest.
>>> I'm sorry I have no way to test this with RTEMS.
>> It's OK. I think you would actually have to build tools, then RTEMS,
>> then the new TCP/IP stack as an add-on package since it is an external
>> package.
>> The patch looks OK to me.
> Yes, it's fine.  We can also go the full way and remove any RTEMS
> and Cygwin macro check for this as Sebastian proposes.
I committed this with the guards removed.

More information about the Newlib mailing list