What to do with newlib git mirror?

Corinna Vinschen vinschen@redhat.com
Thu Mar 19 08:40:00 GMT 2015

On Mar 18 23:56, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2015 16:42, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 15:19 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > Now that newlib is actually in git, shouldn't this be removed?
> > > 
> > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib.git;a=summary
> > 
> > Yes, IMO it should be removed.
> delist it from the gitweb interface at least.  i think that's what we did with 
> other such repos ... we didn't delete them.
> -mike

Sounds good to me.  The newlib.git repo should also be made read-only,
or, is it already?

Alternatively we convert the /git/newlib.git symlink to point to the
newlib-cygwin.git repo (and set up a cygwin.git symlink the same way),
but afaics, binutils-gdb didn't do that either with their old mirror
repos so I'm not sure we want to set a precedent here.


Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20150319/a0e6c41e/attachment.sig>

More information about the Newlib mailing list