[PATCH 3/3] Use latest <semaphore.h> from FreeBSD for RTEMS

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Mar 11 13:17, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> +#define	SEM_VALUE_MAX	(__INT_MAX__ * 2U + 1U)
> > 
> > Should the definition of SEM_VALUE_MAX be __BSD_VISIBLE?  It's not a
> > definition required or even mentioned in POSIX.
> 
> We have a {SEM_VALUE_MAX} here:
> 
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sem_open.html
> 
> Is this not a define?  In FreeBSD it is not covered by __BSD_VISIBLE.

This is weird.  SEM_VALUE_MAX is not mentioned in
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/semaphore.h.html

Is that a bug in the specification?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20150311/9a4cd8f1/attachment.sig>