[PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib library in one tool-chain release
Wed Aug 13 15:32:00 GMT 2014
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 13:44 +0800, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Thank both of you for the suggestion. I agree _s isn't appropriate here,
> and searched and replaced it with _n in the attached patch. If anyone
> thinks _n isn't clear enough I suggest we just use _nano here, since the
> word is used elsewhere in both file name and configuration option name.
> Is it OK for you guys?
I am happy with _n or _nano.
More information about the Newlib