[PATCH] newlib patch for OpenRISC

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Jul 15 18:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> 
> On 7/15/2014 4:14 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On Jul 12 00:07, Hesham ALMatary wrote:
> >>> From: hesham <hesham@hesham-laptop.(none)>
> >>>
> >>> The following patch is part of my GSoC project--Porting RTEMS to OpenRISC. It
> >>> adds minimal OpenRISC port to newlib without any libgloss stuff.
> >> A ChangeLog entry would be nice. 
> Once that's posted, is this OK to merge?

Sure.

> The OpenRISC folks have libgloss code they can submit. This lets
> the RTEMS port move forward.
> >>  The patch looks basically ok, but
> >> what happened with or16 and or32 target names?  Can you provide some
> >> background why it's ok to nuke them?
> >>
> > All or32 targets has been renamed to or1k now (I believe because of
> > the new 64 bit
> > addition). Also, the new binutils patch here [1] did this renaming. GCC, GDB
> > and RTEMS also follow or1k target name. or32, or16 are no longer used/defined by
> > any of them.
> >
> > [1] https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=73589c9dbddc7906fa6a150f2a2a0ff6b746e8ba
> Yeah.. this was easy to sleep through but it happened. :)

Thanks.  Please go ahead and check it in, Joel.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20140716/43353ca7/attachment.sig>