stdio.h patches for g++ -std=c++11

[Corinna Vinschen]

On May  9 07:52, zosrothko wrote:
> Hi Corinna
> 
> I made a typo in my previous patch. Here the corrected one.

Thanks.  Your patches are missing a matching ChangeLog entry, btw.

However, on second thought I'm not sure that removing the 'i' variations
of the functions from "__cplusplus >= 201103L" in this way is such a
good idea.

The 'i' functions are a newlib extension for embedded targets.

They are not part of any standard, so they are certainly neither part
of "__cplusplus >= 201103L", nor part of "__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L".

So, either we remove these functions from both standards, or we include
them in both standards.

But if we remove them from both standards when will they be defined at
all?  This should be cleared up before making this change.

Is defining them with only

  #if !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)

sufficient?


Corinna


P.S.: For the time being, I removed the fcloseall function from this
      declaration block and made its decalration dependent on
      __GNU_VISIBLE.

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20140509/c0932045/attachment.sig>