[patch, mips] Fix parallel build on MIPS

Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
Mon Sep 30 17:50:00 GMT 2013


On Monday 30 September 2013 12:47:26 Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 23:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:09:18 Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > > This patch I sent out fixes parallel make of the install target on
> > > MIPS.
> > 
> > go for it
> 
> Is that an official approval?  I don't see your name in
> newlib/MAINTAINERS and I was assuming that libgloss had the same
> mantainers as newlib and that I would need an OK from Jeff or Corinna
> to do the checkin (since there is no MIPS CPU maintainer listed).  Or
> are the rules for libgloss different?  I don't want to step on any toes.

for cpu-specific stuff that Jeff/Corinna don't track (which mips seems to fall 
under), people tend to take care of merging.  i don't know if there's an 
official policy on the matter, but that's the status quo i've observed over the 
last few years.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20130930/a1af8b40/attachment.sig>


More information about the Newlib mailing list