[Patch, microblaze]: Add a small Linux BSP

[Michael Eager]

On 07/25/13 19:13, David Holsgrove wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Eager [mailto:eager@eagerm.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013 11:43 am
>> To: newlib@sourceware.org; vinschen@redhat.com; David Holsgrove
>> Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Add a small Linux BSP
>>
>> On 07/23/13 02:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Jul 23 17:16, David Holsgrove wrote:
>>>> On 23 July 2013 17:10, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 23 16:25, David Holsgrove wrote:
>>>>>> From: "David Holsgrove" <...>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> libgloss/ChangeLog
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013-07-23  Edgar E. Iglesias <...>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     * microblaze/Makefile.in: Add LINUX_BSP.
>>>>>>     * microblaze/elf-gloss-linux.ld: New file.
>>>>>>     * microblaze/elf-gloss-linux.specs: Likewise.
>>>>>>     * microblaze/linux-crt0.S: Likewise.
>>>>>>     * microblaze/linux-inbyte.c: Likewise.
>>>>>>     * microblaze/linux-outbyte.c: Likewise.
>>>>>>     * microblaze/linux-syscalls-wrap.c: Likewise.
>>>>>>     * microblaze/linux-syscalls.S: Likewise.
>>>>>>     * microblaze/linux-syscalls.h: Likewise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please apply.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Corinna,
>>>>
>>>> I don't have write perms on newlib - can I request them, or can you
>>>> apply the patch for me?
>>>
>>> Everything applied.
>>
>> This patch breaks breaks existing mb-gcc compilations.
>>
>> Please revert the patch until it can be fixed.
>>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Can you provide details regarding the breakage?
>
> This should be a separate library and not linked in by default - what sort
> of compilation errors are you seeing?

libgloss/sbrk.o is being linked into executables instead of
libgloss/microblaze/sbrk.o, which results in an unresolved reference to _end.


-- 
Michael Eager	 eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306  650-325-8077