[PATCH 64bit] ssize_t

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 02/20/2013 06:40 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> GCC requires exact symmetry of types between ssize_t and size_t.
>
> GCC does not know or care about ssize_t; it's not an ISO C type.  POSIX,
> which defines ssize_t, does not require it to be the signed type
> corresponding to size_t.

Fact is, I've encountered them more than once and recall me having 
reported such issues several times at several places.

I don't have one at hand right now, but I guess I can google for them.

Ralf