[PATCH 64bit] ssize_t
Wed Feb 20 17:41:00 GMT 2013
On 02/20/2013 10:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Guarantee? No. We can only make an educated guess. Just for testing
> I tried it on i686-pc-cygwin and i686-w64-mingw32 and both return
> #define __SIZE_TYPE__ unsigned int
> If the educated guess doesn't work, a machine dependent override will
> be necessary.
> And I agree with Ralf. In the long run, GCC should really define
> __SSIZE_TYPE__ and friends...
If only gcc had given us __SSIZE_TYPE__ to begin with. We could
generate __SIZE_TYPE__ from __SSIZE_TYPE__ (slap on an unsigned); but
once the unsigned is there, there is no way in C preprocessor to pull it
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 621 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Newlib