[PATCH] add memrchr(3)
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Wed May 23 13:09:00 GMT 2012
Hi Yaakov,
On May 9 14:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 08:23 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > sizeof(unsigned char) is defined by C to be exactly 1; I always
> > question code that spells it out longhand instead of using 1.
>
> But, but, magic numbers! :-) Not that I care either way here.
>
> > >> if (src > src_end) >> break;
> >
> > Also, src will never be > src_end - memchr returns NULL rather than
> > reading beyond the bounds of length.
>
> Actually, it *was* returning values beyond src_end and the effects
> weren't pretty, hence the check.
>
> > Additionally, I think that searching forwards through the array via one
> > function call per occurrence of the byte in question is wasteful -
> > since we already know the array bounds, we might as well search in
> > reverse by doing a single C loop that iterates backwards over a word at
> > a time. strrchr must search forwards, because it is also searching for
> > the terminating NUL and doesn't know the length in advance, but memrchr
> > should be faster.
>
> Fair enough, so code duplication it is then. Revised source file
> attached.
Could you please provide a ChangeLog entry as well?
Thanks,
Corinna
More information about the Newlib
mailing list