configure.in vs. configure.ac (Re: RFA: Add Epiphany newlib & libgloss port)
Tue Nov 8 15:51:00 GMT 2011
Quoting Jim Meyering <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Using the "configure.in" name rather than "configure.ac" is really
> anachronistic. Better to switch to the latter (it's been 10 years),
> if only to avoid making people wonder which version of autoconf you require.
> It will probably avoid some warnings, too, for those who enable them.
All the autoconf template files in newlib and libgloss are named
If I add a port with confiure.ac, it'll be the odd one out.
More information about the Newlib