[patch] remove atoff
Ralf Corsepius
ralf.corsepius@rtems.org
Fri Aug 26 17:05:00 GMT 2011
On 08/26/2011 06:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> You can remove the declarations from headers, so that new apps won't use
> it, but you may NOT remove the function itself, without breaking shared
> library clients of newlib like cygwin.
>
It's impossible for Cygwin to remove very unlikely used symbols from its
dll?
Sounds like a serious defect and serious limitation of Cygwin to me.
Ralf
More information about the Newlib
mailing list