[patch] remove atoff

Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsepius@rtems.org
Fri Aug 26 17:05:00 GMT 2011


On 08/26/2011 06:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote:

> You can remove the declarations from headers, so that new apps won't use
> it, but you may NOT remove the function itself, without breaking shared
> library clients of newlib like cygwin.
>

It's impossible for Cygwin to remove very unlikely used symbols from its 
dll?

Sounds like a serious defect and serious limitation of Cygwin to me.

Ralf



More information about the Newlib mailing list