Redefinition of PTHREAD_MUTEX_xxx

Joel Sherrill
Mon Aug 1 17:23:00 GMT 2011

On 08/01/2011 07:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 29 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I noticed something I think is redundant
>> and useless in sys/types.h.
>> There is a block of code conditional
>> on XMK and RTEMS which defines
>> Later there is a block of code conditional
>> redefines them different values.
>> As best I can tell, both RTEMS and XMK
>> so trip both blocks of code.
>> The first has comments on the constants
>> while the second (UNIX98) block does not.
>> With confirmation that both XMK and
>> RTEMS trip both blocks and the first is
>> useless, I propose the following:
>> + move the comments from the first
>>    to the second block
>> + remove the first block
>> Can I get a doublecheck on the analysis
>> and then I will submit a patch.
> I have a deja-vu...
> Right, this has been discussed already on this list, see the thread
> starting here:
I wonder how I slept through that.  Apparently
I rediscovered it with my clang experiments.
> So, given
> we're still waiting for a reply from Ralf.
I am happy with Sebastian's patch to sys/types.h.
It is what I had in mind.

If you are OK with it for XMK, it is OK for RTEMS.
> Ralf?  Could you please have a look?
> Thanks,
> Corinna

Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
    Support Available             (256) 722-9985

More information about the Newlib mailing list