a minor mistake in div.c comment?

Can Finner can.finner@gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 05:35:00 GMT 2011

in newlib/libc/div.c, there is following comment words:
         * r.rem will have the same sign as denom and the opposite
	 * sign of num; if both are negative and r.quot has been
	 * truncated towards -inf, r.rem will be positive (will
	 * have the opposite sign of num).
should it be "+inf"? or did I take it wrong?

Thanks very much.


More information about the Newlib mailing list