Wed May 18 12:19:00 GMT 2011
On 05/18/2011 09:47 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:16, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Generally speaking, I am opposed to furtherly extending newlib with
>> non-standardized functions like these.
>> I don't know what others (esp. Cygwin) think about such kind of extensions,
>> but I'd like to see "not implemented" for RTEMS
>> (i.e. at minimum #ifndef __rtems__).
> Cygwin's homepage makes it pretty clear:
>> a Linux API layer providing substantial Linux API functionality.
> First, stdio/fpurge.c is ELIX_LEVEL_4. Secondly, why should
> __fpurge(3) be any different than fpurge(3)?
History - We don't use neither and will likely want to get rid of
More information about the Newlib