[PATCH] __fpurge(3)

[Yaakov (Cygwin/X)]

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:16, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Generally speaking, I am opposed to furtherly extending newlib with
> non-standardized functions like these.
>
> I don't know what others (esp. Cygwin) think about such kind of extensions,
> but I'd like to see "not implemented" for RTEMS
> (i.e. at minimum #ifndef __rtems__).

Cygwin's homepage makes it pretty clear:

> a Linux API layer providing substantial Linux API functionality.

First, stdio/fpurge.c is ELIX_LEVEL_4.  Secondly, why should
__fpurge(3) be any different than fpurge(3)?


Yaakov
Cygwin/X