Wed May 18 11:46:00 GMT 2011
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:16, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Generally speaking, I am opposed to furtherly extending newlib with
> non-standardized functions like these.
> I don't know what others (esp. Cygwin) think about such kind of extensions,
> but I'd like to see "not implemented" for RTEMS
> (i.e. at minimum #ifndef __rtems__).
Cygwin's homepage makes it pretty clear:
> a Linux API layer providing substantial Linux API functionality.
First, stdio/fpurge.c is ELIX_LEVEL_4. Secondly, why should
__fpurge(3) be any different than fpurge(3)?
More information about the Newlib